interference may explain the statistical link between stress and crash risk
by adding to the driving task demands. Stress responses also divert
attentional resources leading to performance decrements particularly if
the driving task is demanding. DriverMetrics
administration of the Driver Risk Index™ profiles to enable behavioural
interventions to be delivered according to the specific strengths and
weaknesses reported. These interventions focus on developing driver
safety-enhancing appraisals and coping responses to improve safety when
driving for work.
Bergomi, M., et al. (2017). Work-related Stress and Role of Personality in a
Sample of Italian Bus Drivers. 433 – 440.
Besharati, M. M., & Kashani, A. T., (2017). Factors contributing to intercity
commercial bus drivers’ crash involvement risk, Archives of Environmental &
Dorn, L., Stephen, L, Wåhlberg, A.E, & Gandolfi, J. (2010). Development and
validation of a self-report measure of bus driver behaviour. Ergonomics, 53 (12),
Gandolfi, J., & Dorn, L. (2005). Development of the Police Driver Risk Index. In L.
Dorn (Ed.) Driver Behaviour and Training, Volume II, pp. 337-347. Aldershot:
Hartley, L. R., & El Hassani, J. (1994). Stress, violations and accidents. Applied
Ergonomics, 25, 221-230.
Kontogiannis, T. (2006) Patterns of driver stress and coping strategies in a Greek
sample and their relationship to aberrant behaviours and traffic accidents,
Accident Analysis and Prevention 38(5), 913-924.
Matthews, G., Desmond, P. A., Joyner, L., Carcary, B., & Gilliland, K. (1997). A
comprehensive questionnaire measure of driver stress and affect. In T.
Rothengatter, & E. C. Vaya, Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and
Application, pp. 317-324. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Matthews, G., Dorn, L., & Glendon, A. I. (1991). Personality correlates of driver
stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 535-549.
Matthews, G., Tsuda, A., Xin, G., & Ozeki, Y. (1999a). Individual differences in
driver stress vulnerability in a Japanese sample. Ergonomics, 42, 401-415.